YS Sharmila, the Andhra Pradesh Congress Committee State President, has stirred up political circles by writing a three-page open letter addressed to YSR fans. In this letter, she disclosed crucial details while addressing misinformation allegedly spread by Sakshi Media, which is controlled by her brother, Jagan Mohan Reddy. YS Sharmila’s letter aims to clarify facts, highlight familial dynamics, and assert her rightful share in family-owned businesses. Here is a breakdown of the key points YS Sharmila revealed in the letter.
Clarification on Sakshi Media’s Coverage
Sharmila began her letter by expressing concern over reports in Sakshi Media, stating that since the media outlet is managed by Jagan Mohan Reddy, it tends to reflect his narrative. She stressed that her intention behind writing this open letter is to provide YSR’s followers with real facts about the family’s property distribution and relationships.
Referring to a book written by Jagan about their parents—YS Rajasekhar Reddy (YSR) and YS Vijayamma—YS Sharmila shared a particular quote: “The world was one for Rajasekhar Reddy, and so was YS Sharmila.” She emphasized that she was not only her father’s daughter but also his lifeline, pointing out how YSR always valued her equally despite societal biases against daughters.
YSR’s Legacy: Equal Ownership Among Grandchildren
According to YS Sharmila, YSR was explicit in his vision of equal distribution of wealth among his grandchildren. She stated that all businesses established during YSR’s lifetime—such as Saraswati, Bharti Cements, Sakshi Media, Classic Realty, and Yelahanka Property—were intended to be family assets. She clarified that, except for one property in Sandur, the family businesses were to be divided equally among all four grandchildren.
Importantly, YS Sharmila revealed that YSR never assigned ownership of these businesses exclusively to Jagan Mohan Reddy. Instead, Jagan was entrusted with the responsibility of acting as a guardian to oversee the family businesses and ensure an equitable division among the children. She emphasized that this was YSR’s mandate, known to the entire family and close friends, including KVP Ramachandra Rao, YV Subbareddy, and Vijayasai Reddy.
No Property Transfers During YSR’s Lifetime
YS Sharmila dismissed rumors that YSR had distributed any family property while he was alive. She clarified that no property transfers took place, neither during her father’s lifetime nor immediately after his sudden death. She also mentioned that none of the family’s wealth has been legally transferred into her possession to date.
Responding to claims that Jagan’s assets are self-earned, YS Sharmila asserted that these properties were inherited family assets and not Jagan’s wealth. She further disclosed that her grandfather’s property, though registered in her name when she was young, was not part of any formal distribution from her father. She emphasized that if YSR had explicitly assigned certain properties to specific family members, only then could it be considered a proper distribution of wealth.
Jagan Mohan Reddy’s Role as Family Trustee
Sharmila’s letter also stressed that Jagan’s current role was to act as a custodian of the family’s businesses, ensuring the assets were fairly divided among the children as per YSR’s wishes. She argued that it is misleading to claim that any property division took place while YSR was alive. According to her, Jagan’s duty was to protect and manage the businesses, not claim ownership over them.
She reiterated that YSR intended the businesses to be shared equally, ensuring all family members benefited from his legacy. Her open letter serves as a reminder to YSR’s followers and the general public that the current narrative being projected by Jagan and Sakshi Media may not reflect the true intentions of YSR.
Conclusion: A Call for Truth
Sharmila’s letter is not just a response to media reports but a heartfelt attempt to set the record straight about her family’s internal matters. She has appealed to YSR fans to understand the facts and reflect on her father’s real intentions for the family. By publicly disclosing these sensitive details, YS Sharmila aims to correct the narrative, ensuring that the legacy of YSR is not misrepresented.
Her letter sheds light on the underlying family dynamics, property disputes, and the responsibilities entrusted to Jagan Mohan Reddy. It underscores the importance of adhering to YSR’s vision for the equal distribution of family wealth and preserving his legacy.
Read Also YS Jagan and YS Sharmila’s Conflict over Saraswati Power Shares
Leave a Reply